Tuesday, December 22, 2009

The Family and Uganda's "Anti-Homosexuality Bill," part 2.

Not long ago, I spoke about the Family's connection to Uganda's proposed gay death penalty bill with Terry Gross of NPR's "Fresh Air." To my surprise, the Family man who'd established the Family's relationship with Ugandan dictator Yoweri Museveni demanded the right to respond. I supported him; if the Family wants to go public, I'm all for it.

I went down to Hunter's house, across the street from the Cedars, and spent an afternoon talking with him. Hunter's part of a small liberal faction within the Family. More importantly, he's part of a faction that would like to move toward greater transparency. Most important, he's opposed to the gay death penalty bill, and was willing to break with the Family custom of secrecy to make that known. Below is a link to the entire transcript of "Fresh Air"'s interview with Hunter. But first, I want to highlight what I think are some important points:

1. Hunter acknowledges the Family's secrecy: "We are little too secretive. There are some things have to be secret, you know.

2. He thinks the secrecy should end and reports that there was recently a meeting about doing so (the verdict, for now, is that the secrecy will continue; but Hunter is clearly going in a different direction):
"GROSS: Why now? What was that meeting the reaction to?

Mr. HUNTER: Well, it was part reaction to Sharlet's book and this history, you know, troubles and the inability for anyone to be able to respond because they just don't have a mechanism for responding. And so the media looks for a Web site, I would too. And there is nothing there and so the media goes, well, it must be a secret organization even though Jeff Sharlet found 273 footnotes in his book. So, it isn't totally secret. And so, it's - I think the secrecy will end.


3. Hunter says I acknowledge that nobody in the Family is involved in the bill. In fact, in the short article I wrote about my conversation with Hunter -- which I cleared with Hunter before publishing -- I noted that the three Ugandans most discussed in relation to the bill, MP David Bahati, Ethics Minister Nsaba Buturo, and President Musveni, are all linked to the Family.

4. I did acknowledge that none of the Americans involved with the Family seems to support the bill. But it's just as important to acknowledge that men such as Senator James Inhofe, Senator Chuck Grassley, Rep. Joe Pitts, and Senator Tom Coburn condemned the bill only after a concerted campaign of public and private pressure. None of these men presented any kind of profile in courage. But I'll give Hunter credit: He's gone public in a much more effective way than his better-known brothers in Christ.

Here's the whole transcript.

17 comments:

Oginikwe said...

Hello Jeff,
I read your book last January and was quite taken with it. It was well written and the reseach was also well done. Everytime I hear of you being interviewed a bout your book or hear it mentioned in the news, that really makes my day because people are waking up to our theocratic leanings.

I have always wondered how this brand of Christians rationalize their very un-Christian behavior towards others who are not like them. I guess that when you view Christ as the Ubermensh who is strong and bloody, and the starving hordes as collateral damage of that strength, as well as having the hubris to believe that you are Christ's chosen warrior and answer only to him, well, then any and all harmful acts would be considered pious. If this is what heaven is about, then I'm going to the other place.

Many of us Michigan Democrats are fed up with Bart Stupak. We are looking for another Democrat to run against him.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Thanks, Jeff, for uncovering the Christian conspiracy to take over the world!

I hope you now turn your attention to the Jews and the Protocols of Zion, the Illuminati, and Bigfoot.

Jeff Sharlet said...

And thank you, "Anonymous," for boldly posting anonymously on a subject about which you haven't bothered to inform yourself. As I state in my introduction and throughout the book, the Family is not a conspiracy; nor are they trying to "take over the world." That's not the argument. But thanks for chipping it with some helpful anonymous know-nothingism!

Anonymous said...

Just because you say it is not a conspiracy theory does not mean it is not.

Anonymous said...

Why should American politicians have to comment upon legislation up for consideration in another country? They don't vote for it.

Jeff Sharlet said...

When are you going to get your facts straight, Bold Anonymous? I don't say it's not a conspiracy theory: I say, plainly, that the Family is not a conspiracy. They are entitled to do what they do, just as we are entitled to ask questions. I've been pleased that the Family's Bob Hunter, a longtime associate, recently decided to go public to confirm that. Bob noted that the group exists, offered examples of its influence, and acknowledged that it has been too secretive. As the man who built the Family's relationship with Uganda, he also argued that it was important for American Family members with influence there to use it. With access, he argues, should come accountability. And with billions in foreign aid should go some concern for the most basic of human rights. Bob put pressure on his American allies, and everyone but you and David Bahati, it seems, has been glad to hear arch conservatives since as Senator Jim Inhofe and Senator Tom Coburn make clear that their opposition to homosexuality does not extend to its criminalization.

You'd be a lot easier to take seriously, Anonymous, if you'd put your name to your convictions. As is, your cowardice trumps any argument you might make.

Oginikwe said...

In thinking about Uganda, who will be the next group to be criminalized? Why would the Christian right want to back and proclaim victory against gays in a country where, according to one of the charismatic pastors, a vocal supporter of this bill, Martin Ssempa, “a coven of witches live under Lake Victoria, has a rapt student following and has organized antihomosexuality parades and burned condoms” (Time, Dec. 10, 2009). I know that politics can make for strange bedfellows but witches? And, that’s okay with Rick Warren and others? That would be my first clue that something ain’t right.

According to Time magazine, Rick Warren who called Uganda “a purpose driven nation,” has cut ties with Ssempa because of the controversy surrounding this bill in Uganda ( Dec. 9, 2009). “Cutting ties” hardly exonerates him from the fruits of his labors; he has a responsibility towards what he has built. Time reports: “Rick Warren, however, seems to be avoiding tackling the subject directly. Although he cut ties with Ssempa, the popular preacher released a statement to Newsweek saying, ‘It is not my personal calling as a pastor in America to comment or interfere in the political process of other nations.’” This quote is from a man who has personal ties to Uganda’s political movers and shakers, and he sounds remarkably like the Catholic Church during Hitler’s Final Solution. Then, of course, we have Bahati, a member of the Family.

I have learned to ask, “Who profits?” Who profits from this bill? If it is illegal to be gay, punishable by life imprisonment, illegal to know that someone is gay and not report it (which makes intimates-family, friends, and lovers- complicit in this unjust law to save themselves), and a law that may be twisted in many ways to prove someone as “helping to promote homosexuality,” then what has happened to the $285 million sent to Uganda by PEPFAR to fight HIV/AIDS? Who’s holding those purse strings? Ssempa’s Campus Alliance received funds through the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda which received $15 million, and other churches that support the bill have also received PEPFAR funds. There’s the profit in hate.
Whatever happened to hate the sin, but love the sinner?

To anonymous’ list of mythical characters, I would add Satan. How convenient it is to have a mythical character upon which to project your own issues. Christians are fond of saying that Satan’s greatest feat is convincing us that he doesn’t exist. I disagree with that: Satan’s (if there is one)greatest feat is convincing people that they act in God’s/Jesus’/Mohammed’s/ (insert name here) behalf. Not only do they not have to face themselves but they can also convince themselves that they know what Christ meant instead of what he actually taught.

UGG Times said...

Under asics ultimate 81 the agreement, Asics onitsuka tiger ultimate 81 footwear will be available in India ultiamte 81 onitsuka tiger by April 2010, initially at Reliance Footprint ultimate 81 tiger stores in Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore,ultimate 81 onitsuka Hyderabad, Chennai and Kochi, the companies mexico 66 asics tiger said in a joint statement.Asics will have the asics mexico 66 right to sell its products at its own exclusive onitsuka tiger ultimate brand outlets, in addition to onitsuka tiger mexcio 66 being sold at Reliance Footprint stores.

Anonymous said...

I don't typically comment on political issues. But this one concerned me. The only thing I want cleared up is for those who run this blog to make it clear that just because there is a group called The Family, that ties itself into some sort of a form of Christianity (that being that they quote verses as their backing) doesn't mean that everyone who calls themselves Christian or Evangelical would support or even tie themselves in with that lot. We need to make it clear to everyone that there are different views within a religious beleif. Just because one group goes way off the deep end of reason doesn't mean the rest of the group is doing it as well (meaning those who call themselves Christians wouldn't support this bill in Uganda becomes it goes against Jesus' teachings). There's a big difference between Evangelicals and this Family.

Jeff Sharlet said...

I don't think anyone connected with this blog -- that'd be me alone -- has ever in any way suggested that, "Anonymous." Just the opposite, in fact.

jack chan said...

m40372
Louis Vuitton Neo
louis vuitton verona gm
louis vuitton laptop sleeve
louis vuitton speedy 35
lv speedy 35
verona mm
lv verona mm
louis vuitton beaubourg
louis vuitton citadin
lv purses
louis vuitton speedy 30 damier ebene
louis vuitton insolite wallet
louis vuitton mini citadin
lv josephine
louis vuitton romance
thames gm
louis vuitton alma
louis vuitton speedy
louis vuitton speedy 25

jack chan said...

epi speedy
Louis Vuitton Brooklyn
louis vuitton papillon 30
Louis Vuitton Sobe Clutch
keepall 50
couguar
sac lv
louis vuitton messenger
Sarah Wallet
louis vuitton delightful
Louis Vuitton Laptop Sleeve
Monogram Vernis
LV Monogram Vernis
Louis Vuitton Monogram Vernis
popincourt
somptueux
louis vuitton popincourt haut
Marilyn White
louis vuitton pouch
louis vuitton wilshire
taiga leather
cabas mezzo
louis vuitton hudson
louis vuitton stephen sprouse

jack chan said...

Louis Vuitton Monogram Vernis
popincourt
somptueux
louis vuitton popincourt haut
Marilyn White
louis vuitton pouch
louis vuitton wilshire
taiga leather
cabas mezzo
louis vuitton hudson
louis vuitton stephen sprouse
Stephen Sprouse
Pochette
bum bag
alexandra wallet
louis vuitton batignolles
louis vuitton totally
louis vuitton denim
lv alma
louis vuitton stresa
louis vuitton josephine wallet
josephine wallet
Bosphore

Anonymous said...

Cubic zirconias are the best choice for thomas sabo those of you who doesn't thomas sabo charms want to spend too much money on thomas sabo jewellery buying a diamond engagement ring but still want something that looks almost identical. thomas sabo charms sale Let's face it, wouldn't it make more sabo charms sense to save the money for a new car instead? cheap thomas sabo charms With cubic zirconia's, the only way to tell the difference between it and a thomas sabo jewellry diamond is to get a professional jeweler to have a look at it. discount thomas sabo charms To untrained eye, it looks just the same. thomas sabo sale charms The other advantage to zirconia's is that you can choose from a range of colors, and pick the most suitable color of stone for the engagement ring.

Jimmy choo outlet said...

Christian Louboutin black patent leather Ballerina Tag flats |Christian Louboutin black patent leather Ballerina Tag flats
Christian Louboutin Candy studded flats |Christian Louboutin Candy studded flats
Christian Louboutin magenta leather 'Ballerina Tag' flats |Christian Louboutin magenta leather 'Ballerina Tag' flats
Christian Louboutin Rosella ballerina flats |Christian Louboutin Rosella ballerina flats
Christian Louboutin Rosella leather flats |Christian Louboutin Rosella leather flats

Yves Saint Laurent Shoes said...

Christian Louboutin Carnaval Black
Christian Louboutin Alta Nodo Purple Platform d'Orsay
Christian Louboutin Arielle A Talon ankle boots
Giuseppe Zanotti Sculpted Leather Platform Boots
Alexander Wang Sigrid Tall Zip Boot